“When I was young there were beatniks. Hippies. Punks. Gangsters. Now you’re a hacktivist. Which I would probably be if I was 20. Shuttin’ down MasterCard. But there’s no look to that lifestyle! Besides just wearing a bad outfit with bad posture. Has WikiLeaks caused a look? No! I’m mad about that. If your kid comes out of the bedroom and says he just shut down the government, it seems to me he should at least have an outfit for that.”
@jerseydevious read Creature of the Night and causally presented to me the idea of Batman being something Dick willed to life to bring justice to his parents’ killer, and i ran 20 miles with it
The only acceptable reason for this is if this character is actually a demon who seduces men and then eats them. [source]
who wrote this, expose him
my breasts are nicely separated. Completely divided, every year they move apart by half an inch.
My breasts are nicely separated though they still fight for custody of the children.
I,,a woman,,,am WiDeR LOweR dOwN
That was difficult to read.
So ugly
My name is Ebony D’arkness Dementia Raven Way, and my breasts are nicely separated
OH MY GOD WHAT IS THAT AND HOW ON EARTH DID IT GET PUBLISHED
You can always tell when it’s a man writing a description because they focus oddly on the breasts. There will always be something about breasts and I can’t tell you how many times I’ve read historical or fantasy fiction and they talk about “her breasts hanging freely under her tunic” or what the fuck ever and it’s like…women don’t do that? We don’t describe ourselves by saying “I have blonde hair and blue eyes and my breasts hang freely under my tunic”. I kind of feel like we should counter by awkwardly mentioning all male character’s balls in their description. It’s kind of in the same vein.
“I have auburn hair and hazel eyes and my copious nicely separated balls hangs freely under my breeches”
G E T W I D E R L O W E R D O W N
“To get back to my body”
This is the first time I saw this post with art and I am in tears.
Reblogging again because IT HAS BEEN ILLUSTRATED NOW 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
Estrange:
cause (someone) to be no longer close or affectionate to someone; alienate
Cataclysm:
a sudden violent upheaval
Anticlimactic:
lacking climax, disappointing or ironically insignificant following of
impressive foreshadowing.
—
The dorm room
door is open, but nobody ever comes to Chuck’s room so at first the knock
doesn’t register. He’s got an exam in a
couple of days, and he’s got his nose almost touching the page of his advanced
comp sci textbook when the knocking comes again, a little bit louder, jolting
him upright.
“Sorry!” He says, and snaps his book shut, squinting
at the figure silhouetted against the light from the hallway. “I…oh.”
If two people were connected so that person A could feel what person B was feeling (physically wise), would person A be able to hear what person B is hearing too
Since sound is just air particles and sound waves bending the hairs in your inner ear in minute amounts to send specific electric signals to the brain that are then processed and translated as actual words and things…
would person A need to have the sound waves actually present to hear what person B’s hearing, or would the connection include the physical sensation of the bending ear hairs so that those signals would also be sent to A without actual sound?